tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32622692.post4158060638419719171..comments2023-10-21T08:08:43.106-04:00Comments on Blazing Indiscretions: INCLUDE NADER IN THE DEBATES!JayVhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02892272648798100594noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32622692.post-866913377660988552008-09-27T08:41:00.000-04:002008-09-27T08:41:00.000-04:00It's one thing to exclude Nader from the debates, ...It's one thing to exclude Nader from the debates, but it's even more outrageous that they're excluding him from the news. <BR/><BR/>-- MCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32622692.post-75955864473933583942008-09-26T16:12:00.000-04:002008-09-26T16:12:00.000-04:00Unfortunately, unlike the filthy rich Perot, none ...Unfortunately, unlike the filthy rich Perot, none of the current 'third party' candidates have the cash to buy their way into the debates.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32622692.post-69337280180376244002008-09-26T14:14:00.000-04:002008-09-26T14:14:00.000-04:00The 1992 Presidential Debates with Ross Perot were...The 1992 Presidential Debates with Ross Perot were not dull. His warnings have now come true. Replace John McCain with Ron Paul. Add Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney. Barack Obama must earn his victory, not win by default.<BR/><BR/>Washington University '81Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com