Some of 24 Oranges’ most memorable posts
4 years ago

Beatrix Wilhelmina Armgard van Oranje Nassau. Since 1980 she’s been the queen and symbol of the Netherlands. As head of state, Queen Beatrix is elevated above all other institutions. It is her task to unite all Dutch citizens. “In accepting this office I have vowed to propagate respect for the nation.”43 photos to commemorate the anniversary in this Parool.nl album.
It wasn’t easy at first. Both her marriage in 1966 to the German Prince Claus so soon after the end of the Second World War and her swearing in as queen exactly 30 years ago this month caused an uproar that echoed far beyond the country’s borders.


The Dutch government knew of the SS membership of the late Prince Bernhard as early as 1944, according to NRC Handelsblad.More (in Dutch):
The newspaper bases its finding on documents released by the National Archive in The Hague earlier this year. One of the documents refers to a coded telegram, dated September 1944, from Foreign Minister Eelco van Kleffens. The telegram reveals the cabinet knew Prince Bernhard had briefly joined the SS but suspected he had been unable to avoid doing so, "possibly in order to prevent something worse". In the telegram, the foreign minister instructs the Dutch ambassador in the United States not to refute claims, made by American media as of 1941, that Prince Bernhard had been a member of the SS.
Until now, it was not clear if the Dutch cabinet knew such allegations had any basis in fact. For many years Prince Bernhard remained evasive on his links with the Nazi NSDAP party and related organisations. In an interview with De Volkskrant, published shortly after his death in December 2004, the prince admitted to his SS membership for the first time. He always denied having belonged to the NSDAP.
[...] It was a shocking event to witness anywhere but made even more so because it happened so close to home, on a sunny day when everyone was out having fun.Today from Radio Netherlands, discussing future celebrations of Queen's Day (and Rememberance Day on May 4th and Liberation Day on May 5th),
But three days on, there is a danger that the Netherlands is descending into a strange sentimentality. [...]
There are soul searching articles about how life in the Netherlands will never be the same again.
And will it?
The one important question is, of course, why? There is no terror cell at work here, no carefully coordinated attack by animal rights activitists or Al Quaeda. There is no enemy to vent anger at - just the action of a lone, and perhaps lonely man, who flipped for whatever reason.
We have been hit by this attack because we watched it happen and we are still watching it, again and again and again.
No amount of security would have stopped this man doing what he did. This time he drove his car through the crowd watching the queen. Next time he could be entering a school with a machine gun or a creche with a knife.
Life in the Netherlands has not changed for all of us, only for those who have lost loved ones or who were closely involved in the aftermath. And wallowing in sentimentality helps no-one. The tv images will fade - if we stop watching them. And we should not be hypnotising ourselves into thinking otherwise.
The present Queen has also been known to be defiant in the face of adversity in the past. In 1980 she choose to hold her coronation in Amsterdam in spite of demonstrations planned by the squatter's movement to disrupt the event. The day was marred by serious rioting in the capital.The print and television media have pushed the story to morbid extremes. Adding to the confusion - from an article [Dutch] in Volkskrant: the tabloid newspaper AD has apologised for posting a photo of a man they said was Karst T., but it turns out he wasn't. The man has the same surname as Mr T. At least the paper's official didn't give the usual excuse, "mistakes were made," but actually apologised (We betreuren het enorm dat dit is gebeurd...); AD won't relegate its correction to the back pages - it will appear on the front page. In this kind of media frenzy and rush to further sensationalize a tragedy, and sell papers (for it happens frequently in the US, too), I always wonder whether the legal department, editorial board and fact checkers are asleep on the job. Think of the harm potential harm to the man whose photo was published. Of course, these kinds of photo mistakes have occur often in US newspapers and on television, sometimes with tragic consequences - usually to ex-cons, notably sex offenders, who have already done their time, are rehabilitated and are set "free," but still receive harassment from "society."
Prince Constantijn [the second son of Queen Beatrix] speaking outside the World Press Photo award ceremony on Sunday said that the royal family will continue to do the things it does with conviction,"In this country and as a family we value openness and accessibility. So in that sense we will continue with our heads held high."
"A shaken, dreadfully looking queen almost burst into tears when addressing her Dutchmen. Compare this with her perfect radiating majestic wellgroomed look this morning! Even her hairdo lost all energy... :( A black day in Dutch History.
3rd time NL lost its innocence (after Fortuyn, Van Gogh...). The laidback character of our country is ruined for ever."

Eye witnesses speculated that the accident may have been an attempted attack on the Royal Family. Others say that the car went off course with a shattered windscreen and that the driver appeared to be slumped motionless over the wheel. The vehicle came to a halt after crashing into a monument (pictured right).The photo on the left shows the reaction of the Prince of Orange and HRH Princess Máxima after the accident.
The incident occurred minutes after a luxury open-top coach carrying the Royal Family passed the spot (pictured below). The coach briefly stopped and was then accompanied to Het Loo palace by security forces.
Queen Beatrix has sent a message expressing her sympathy to the victims. The government information service says the queen and her family are deeply shocked by the incident.

Prins Willem-Alexander (Foto: ANP)


sparked a marital crisis at Soestdijk Palace. Prince Bernhard leaked the story to the German press to force the Dutch government to take action and remove a potential threat to the monarchy. However, it took a second government commission as well as threats against the life of Greet Hofmans by former resistance fighters to persuade the queen to break all ties to the controversial faith healer.


This never hit the press.Oranje Fonds window.
The Orange Fund (Willem-Alexander & Máxima's wedding fund) commissioned Marc Mulders to make this stained glass window at their premises at Utrecht (at the Utrecht stately avenue/"mall" the Maliebaan). Our good man who designed the Silver Jubilee Window in Amsterdam...
Fascinating with that light falling through it.
It was unveiled by the couple Dec. 2007. They must love his work.
I hope they will commission him to make a work for one of the palaces once. Of course they will... The Orange artistic taste is impeccable.

After 50 years on the throne Queen Wilhelmina, who herself became Queen at the tender age of 18 (back in 1898) 'handed down' her powers as Monarch to her only daughter & heiress, Juliana.Photo: © Bettmann/CORBIS
Amsterdam, September 6, 1948 was an exceptional day, both for the Dutch Monarchy as well for all those who wanted a new start in life after WWII. [Dutch monarchs are not "crowned."]

Whistle-blower finds support in royal circlesPieter van Vollenhoven analyzes problems rationally. And sometimes he meets criticism with a touch of humour and self-knowledge. He has a really independent mind and isn't afraid to put blame where it belongs. In the letter the state-secretary for Defence was urged to request Professor mr Pieter van Vollenhoven to act as mediator; the Dutch government still has to approve his offer to help Mr Spijkers.
Pieter van Vollenhoven, husband of one of Queen Beatrix's sisters [Princess Margriet, shown in the photograph with Van Vollenhoven], wants to act as a mediator in the case of the whistle-blower Fred Spijkers. He says Mr Spijkers is a courageous man, who he gladly wants to help.
Almost twenty-five years ago, Mr Spijkers prevented a Ministry of Defence cover-up after the deaths of eight soldiers. The eight were killed by landmines with fatal design error in the detonating mechanism. At the time, Fred Spijkers, who was a social worker for the Ministry of Defence, refused to tell the widow of one of the soldiers that his death was caused by his own carelessness. As a result of his action, Mr Spijkers still faces problems with his income, pension and tax assessments today. Several parliamentary parties [Labour, Socialists, GreenLeft, Christian Union , the progressive liberals (D66) and MP Verdonk] have called for these problems to be resolved before the summer.
The Ministry of Defence was aware of the faulty detonating mechanism as early as 1970. But it was only admitted by Defence Minister Joris Voorhoeve in 1997.