Thursday, February 28, 2008


The VIA Westlake Action earlier this month was not covered by the Free Press. Nearly 300 people of faith gathered at St Paul's Cathedral to address the affordable housing segment of that development on Battery Street, to ask the Mayor and CEDO to re-commit to affordable housing and make sure the Westlake debacle would never be repeated. The mayor's answers to the gathering were very disappointing: he would not commit. VIA sent out press releases about the Action, so the Free Press knew about it, but did not send anyone to cover it. Why should they? Because the research done by VIA leaders on the chronology of the Westlake development with the DRB was indeed scathing in its scope. Just what the Mayor and CEDO would not need, as they try to convince the voters to approve ballot item #1.

Ken Picard has done a particularly good piece today about the Westlake developer's paltry payment of $400 K to the city's housing fund. It's not nearly enough. When the City Council voted last week to allow Westlake to pay that amount, I am pleased that three city councilors voted against it: Joan Shannon, Ed Adrian and Andy Montroll.

Battery Street Developer to Pay City $400K in Lieu of Affordable Housing

Local Matters
By Ken Picard [02.27.08]

A Battery Street developer has agreed to pay nearly a half-million dollars into the city’s Housing Trust Fund rather than meet a mandate to build affordable housing units near the Burlington Waterfront. The agreement, approved by the Burlington City Council last week, ends months of extensive negotiations with the developer and helps the city avoid potentially lengthy and costly litigation. The deal also frees up the property, at Battery and Cherry streets, for future development.

The so-called Lofts Building was supposed to be the last phase of the four-part Westlake Development Project, which also included the Westlake luxury condominiums [1], the Courtyard Marriott [2] and a public parking garage. The first three phases of the project have already been completed.

The fourth phase was proposed as three floors of commercial real estate and 13 residential units, of which seven were to be set aside for low- and moderate-income residents. In 2006, the permit was amended to eliminate one floor of commercial property and replace it with eight more residential units. In exchange for building housing in the downtown area, the developer, Westlake Residential Partnership, was given permission to add 20 feet to the height of the hotel and apartments.

Last summer, however, Westlake notified the city that it had run into some legal and technical snafus that prohibited it from completing the project as proposed. To date, no affordable units have been built on any of the properties.

David Scheuer, a partner with Westlake, was out of town this week and couldn’t be reached for comment. Burlington City Attorney Ken Schatz said that, from the city’s standpoint, Westlake was primarily an economic development project, not an affordable housing development. To date, it’s contributed about $120,000 per year in gross receipts taxes, not including city property taxes.

“While we’re still frustrated by the fact that the Lofts Building wasn’t built, from our perspective [this agreement] makes the best of a bad situation,” Schatz says.

Under Burlington ordinance, builders must include a certain percentage of affordable or “inclusionary” housing units in all residential projects, or else pay into the city’s housing trust fund, which can only be used to build more housing for low- to moderate-income residents. To date, in-lieu cash payments to the city are extremely rare, in part because it’s usually cheaper for developers to build apartments than fork over the cash.

The Westlake project was approved under Burlington’s old zoning ordinance, which didn’t specify the amount of in-lieu payments. Under the city’s newly adopted ordinance, builders must now pay $100,000 for every affordable housing unit they’re required to build, but don’t. According to Schatz, the Westlake developer will pay about $41,000 for each inclusionary unit that wasn’t built.

Debbie Ingram, executive director of Vermont Interfaith Action [3], a coalition of religious groups that advocate for more affordable housing options, says that although citizens got “short shrift” on this project, she hopes the city learned a valuable lesson. While she recognizes that the new zoning ordinance will help address the problem somewhat, “We feel that we still need to be vigilant. The laws won’t take care of it automatically.”

One possibility, Ingram suggests, is that the city require future developers to post a bond guaranteeing construction of required affordable housing, a suggestion the city is now considering, according to Brian Pine in the city’s Community and Economic Development Office.

Westlake’s settlement agreement is headed to the Development Review Board for final approval.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for visiting.

Please be considerate... no off-topic, racist, sexist or homophobic comments.

Comment moderation is on.

No anonymous comments will be accepted..